OPERATOR FIELD TOOL / 12 REQUIREMENTS

Review the proposal.
Keep the gaps visible.

Inspect one supplier against the commitment you are considering. Evidence for one requirement cannot cancel a missing mandatory answer elsewhere.

Your iGaming supplier evidence worksheet

Choose which requirements are mandatory for this decision. Mark evidence Verified after the responsible reviewer inspects a relevant artifact. Mark Conflict when observed evidence disagrees with the requirement. Leave missing or unresolved evidence Open.

HOLD: mandatory evidence remains open

0 verified · 12 open · 0 conflicts. 12 mandatory requirements selected. Optional gaps remain visible.

Twelve evidence requirements for one supplier; every row starts open
RequirementRequired for this decision?Evidence state
01Delivery modelA defined platform, custom build, component or engineering-team purchase.
02Proposed teamNamed roles, availability, subcontractors and acceptance authority.
03Provider entitlementRequired provider/PSP agreements, interfaces and environments.
04Account and wallet authoritySystems of record, balance components and identifier namespaces.
05Unresolved provider operationsDuplicate, late and unknown-result handling with retained ownership.
06Permissions and restrictionsBack-office roles, tenant boundaries and account restriction propagation.
07Acceptance evidenceVersioned cases, workload, reviewers, exclusions and open outcomes.
08Comparable commercial scopeSetup, recurring fees, denominators, pass-through costs and buyer work.
09Migration and historyOutstanding obligations, opening reconciliation and readable exports.
10Assets and rightsSource, configuration, dependencies and the actual rights schedule.
11Operating responsibilityCoverage, escalation, containment and recovery authority.
12Handover and exitReceiving-team exercise, data transfer and access removal.
Download the RFP brief ↓

Selections stay in page memory until reload. Export a CSV to retain the review. No completed review is submitted to this site. Add artifact references, reviewers and dates in your approved internal workspace.

What the four gate outcomes mean

Conflict
A mandatory requirement conflicts with the evidence. Resolve the conflict or revise the proposed scope.
Hold
No mandatory conflict, but at least one mandatory requirement remains open.
Selected gates complete
All selected mandatory requirements are verified. Optional gaps still remain visible.
Choose scope
No mandatory requirement is selected. Define the gates for the next commitment.

This proposed tool organizes a review. It does not measure a supplier's quality, establish regulatory approval or authorize a production release. Return to the purchasing decision →